Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 212318c and 0a1819d.

• setup.cfg (1 hunks)
• test_requirements.txt (1 hunks)

test_requirements.txt (1)

20-20: Verify compatibility with pre-release version.

The 0.x.x version number indicates pre-release software. Please ensure that version 0.0.5 has been thoroughly tested with your use cases.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about how safety_schemas is being used in the codebase to better understand its integration and potential impact.

---

Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response as we have sufficient evidence about how safety_schemas is integrated into the codebase.

Pre-release version 0.0.5 appears to be deeply integrated and stable within the codebase

The analysis shows that safety_schemas is a core dependency extensively used throughout the codebase for critical functionality:

• It provides essential data models and schemas used across multiple components (auth, scan, CLI)
• The models are used for core features like vulnerability scanning, project configuration, and policy management
• No critical TODOs or FIXMEs related to safety_schemas compatibility were found
• The integration appears stable with proper type hints and consistent usage patterns

While it is a pre-release version, the extensive integration and lack of schema-related issues in the codebase suggests it's been thoroughly tested in practice. The TODOs found are related to other components and don't indicate any compatibility concerns with safety_schemas.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any compatibility issues or reported bugs with safety_schemas 0.0.5

# Test: Look for potential issues in changelog or release notes
rg -i "safety.?schemas.*0\.0\.5" CHANGELOG.md || echo "No changelog entry found"

# Test: Check for any TODO/FIXME comments related to safety_schemas
rg -i "todo|fixme|hack|xxx|bug.*safety.?schemas" 

Length of output: 1692

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check how safety_schemas is being used in the codebase
rg -l "safety_schemas" 

# Look for specific imports and usage patterns
rg -A 3 "from safety_schemas|import safety_schemas"

# Check for any test files related to safety_schemas
fd "test.*\.py" --exec grep -l "safety_schemas" {} \;

# Look for any configuration or schema files
fd "schema.*\.(json|yaml|yml)" --exec grep -l "safety" {} \;

Length of output: 7186

setup.cfg (1)

53-53: Verify compatibility with other dependencies.

Since safety_schemas is still in early development (0.0.x), let's verify there are no compatibility issues with other packages that might require different versions.

✅ Verification successful

Let me check the content of these files to see the actual version requirements.

---

Let me check if there are any imports or usage patterns of safety_schemas in the codebase to understand how it's being used.

---

Let me try again without specifying the file type since Python type is not recognized:

---

Based on the comprehensive analysis, I can now provide the final response:

The safety_schemas version 0.0.5 is consistently used across the project

The verification shows that:

• Both setup.cfg and test_requirements.txt specify the exact same version (0.0.5)
• The package is extensively used throughout the codebase, primarily for importing models and type definitions
• All imports are using the same schema structures, suggesting version compatibility
• There are no conflicting version requirements found in any of the dependency files

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if any other packages in the ecosystem depend on safety_schemas
# and what versions they require

# Search for safety_schemas as a dependency in setup files
echo "Checking setup files for safety_schemas dependencies..."
rg -l "safety_schemas" -g "setup.{py,cfg}"

# Search for safety_schemas in requirements files
echo "Checking requirements files for safety_schemas dependencies..."
rg -l "safety_schemas" -g "*requirements*.txt"

Length of output: 377

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual version requirements in both files
echo "Content of safety_schemas requirement in setup.cfg:"
rg "safety_schemas" setup.cfg

echo -e "\nContent of safety_schemas requirement in test_requirements.txt:"
rg "safety_schemas" test_requirements.txt

Length of output: 375

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for safety_schemas imports and usage in the codebase
echo "Files importing or using safety_schemas:"
rg -l "from safety_schemas|import safety_schemas|safety_schemas\." --type python

echo -e "\nActual import/usage patterns:"
rg "from safety_schemas|import safety_schemas|safety_schemas\." --type python -A 2

Length of output: 395

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for safety_schemas imports and usage in the codebase
echo "Files importing or using safety_schemas:"
rg -l "from safety_schemas|import safety_schemas|safety_schemas\."

echo -e "\nActual import/usage patterns:"
rg "from safety_schemas|import safety_schemas|safety_schemas\." -A 2

Length of output: 6170